Intellectual Property News and Reports

Miodrag Kostic and Guy Vandevelde appeal from a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claim 3 of Reissue Application No. 16/667,530. Ex parte Kostic, No. 2022-003326, 2022 WL 17223434 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 23, 2022)... Read more →

This is an appeal from the judgment issued by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to a jury verdict and the subsequent denial of motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for... Read more →

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (collectively, Sun) appeal an order from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting Incyte Corporation and Incyte Holdings Corporation’s (collectively, Incyte) motion for a preliminary injunction... Read more →

Incyte Corporation (Incyte) appeals a post-grant review (PGR) final written decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) holding Incyte failed to prove claims 1–7 and 9–21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,561,659 were unpatentable. Because Incyte fails to establish... Read more →

Fintiv, Inc. (“Fintiv”) sued PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal”) for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Relevant here, Fintiv asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 9,892,386 (“the ’386 patent”), 11,120,413 (“the ’413 patent”), 9,208,488 (“the ’488... Read more →

This case presents the question of patent eligibility of four patents directed to the use of machine learning. The patents claim the use of machine learning for the generation of network maps and schedules for television broadcasts and live events.... Read more →

Qualcomm Incorporated appeals from the final written decision on remand of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Apple Inc. filed two petitions for inter partes review challenging as unpatentable as obvious various claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,063,674, owned by... Read more →

Sage Products, LLC (“Sage”) challenges the final written decisions (“FWD”) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) finding all challenged claims of two of its patents unpatentable. Becton, Dickinson and Co. (“BD”), the original appellee in this appeal, withdrew... Read more →

This appeal arises from a suit under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Azurity”) brought suit against Alkem Laboratories Ltd. (“Alkem”) for infringement of claims 5, 7, 8, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 10,959,948 (“the ’948 patent”) following Alkem’s... Read more →

In 2008, plaintiff ams-OSRAM USA Inc. (formerly named Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. and hereafter called “TAOS”) sued Renesas Electronics America, Inc. (formerly named Intersil Corporation and hereafter called “Intersil”) in a federal district court in Texas. TAOS asserted patent... Read more →