Fleet Feet, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.
OverDrive Inc. v. Open E-Book Forum

Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBH

This case involves the breach of an agreement between two parties who shared a trade secret, AcryliCon USA, LLC (“AC-USA”), and Silikal GmbH (“Silikal”). The trade secret consisted of the formula for 1061 SW, a flooring resin Silikal manufactured and sold (along with other flooring resins). The agreement provided that AC-USA and its affiliate, AcryliCon International, Ltd. (“ACInternational”), would be Silikal’s exclusive distributors of 1061 SW and that Silikal would not sell the resin without AcryliCon’s written permission. 

According to AC-USA, Silikal breached the agreement by selling 1061 SW without its written permission, so it sued Silikal under common law for breach of contract (“Contract” claim) and under the Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990 (“GTSA”) for misappropriation of the shared trade secret (“Misappropriation” claim). A jury awarded AC-USA damages of $1.5 million on each of the two claims, and the District Court awarded AC-USA $3 million in punitive damages on the Misappropriation claim. The District Court thereafter denied Silikal’s post verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law on the Misappropriation and Contract claims and entered a final judgment for AC-USA for $5,861,415.

Silikal appeals. It argues first that the District Court erred in denying its motion to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. It argues alternatively that the Court erred in denying its motion for judgment as a matter of law on the Misappropriation and Contract claims. We reject Silikal’s argument that the District Court lacked jurisdiction over its person, and therefore affirm the Court’s denial of Silikal’s motion to dismiss. We are persuaded, though, by Silikal’s argument that AC-USA failed to prove its Misappropriation claim. We also agree that AC-USA failed to prove that it sustained cognizable damages on its Contract claim. We therefore reverse the District Court’s judgment on the Misappropriation claim and vacate the damages awarded on the Contract claim. We also hold that AC-USA is entitled to nominal damages and attorney’s fees on its Contract claim in a sum to be determined by the District Court on remand.

Download Acrylicon USA LLC v. Silikal GMBH

Registering your trademarks is one of the best long-term investments you can make in your business. Contact us today for more information.

Visit Gehrke & Associates, SC.


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)