Norian Corp. v. Stryker Corp.
Fieldturf v. Sprinturf et al.

Perricone v. Medicis Pharm.

CONCLUSION This court affirms the district court’s summary judgment of invalidity of claims 1-19 of the ’063 patent and claims 8, 9, and 13 of the ’693 patent. However, because the district erred in its anticipation analysis of claims 1-4 and 7 of the ’693 patent, this court reverses the district court’s summary judgment of invalidity as to those claims. Moreover, this court vacates the district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement of claims 1-4 and 7 of the ’693 patent, but affirms that summary judgment as to the remaining claims in that patent. Finally, this court affirms the district court’s denials of Medicis’ motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. This court remands for further proceedings.

Downlod the decision.

Registering your trademarks is one of the best long-term investments you can make in your business. Contact us today for more information.

Visit Gehrke & Associates, SC.