Decisioning.com, Inc. v. Federated Dep't Stores

In this case, Decisioning.com, Inc. (“Decisioning”) appeals from three final decisions of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. See HSBC Fin. Corp. v. Decisioning.com, Inc., No. 3:04-CV-1200 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2007) (“HSBC Summary Judgment Order”); Decisioning.com, Inc. v. Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc., No. 3:03-CV-1924 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2007) (“Federated Summary Judgment Order”); Decisioning.com, Inc. v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., No. 3:03-CV-2837 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2007) (“TD Ameritrade Summary Judgment Order”). As relevant to this appeal, the district court determined on summary judgment that Appellees did not infringe Decisioning’s U.S. Patent No. 6,105,007 (“the ’007 patent”) as construed. The district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of the Federated Appellees is affirmed. Its summary judgments of non-infringement in favor of the TD Ameritrade and HSBC Appellees are affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part, and the cases of those appellees are remanded for further proceedings.

Download