The issue before the court is whether or not a signal is patentable subject matter. Petrus A.C.M. Nuijten appeals the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), which rejected claims 14, 22, 23, and 24 in his patent application Serial No. 09/211,928 as unpatentable subject matter outside the scope of 35 U.S.C. § 101. The claims seek to patent any “signal” that has been encoded in a particular manner. Because we agree with the Board that the “signal” claims in Nuijten’s application are not directed to statutory subject matter, we affirm.
Home Page
Contact Information
- Lisa M. Gehrke, JD, MA
- James B. Gehrke, JD
- Therese M. Pease, JD
- Gehrke & Associates, SC
123 North 86th Street
Wauwatosa, WI 53226
USA
(414) 774-0874
(414) 774-4837 Fax
Become a Fan
Categories
- Antitrust
- Bioethics
- Business Law
- Copyright
- Domain Names
- Events
- Firm Updates
- Government Relations
- Licensing
- Music
- Patent
- Patent Case Law
- Patent Case Law -- US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Plant Variety Protection
- Right of Publicity
- Technology
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark
- Trademark Case Law
- Trademark Case Law -- US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
- Useful Information
- USPTO Information
- Web/Tech
Wisconsin Advanced Technology Advocates, Inc.
Creative Protection
Disclaimer
Our web site contains information only and is not intended to create or solicit an attorney-client relationship. Although we welcome your questions and comments, contacting us from this web site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information you may choose to disclose is not privileged or confidential. Nothing on our web site constitutes "legal advice." If you think you may need legal advice, we urge you to consult a lawyer to discuss your unique circumstances.
© 2002-2007 Gehrke & Associates, S.C.
