On the undisputed facts and considering all of the circumstances, we affirm the district court's ruling that SportFields' bid was not an infringing offer to sell the FieldTurf product. Thus the judgment of noninfringement is affirmed.
. . .
The judgment that FieldTurf committed tortious interference and unfair competition is reversed.
. . .
We conclude that the district court clearly erred in deeming this to be an exceptional case under '285. The award of attorney fees is vacated. Each party shall bear its costs on this appeal.
