For the aforementioned reasons, we affirm the Commission’s determination that SKF USA did not establish a material difference between its own products and those of the respondents based on post-sale technical and engineering services. We thus affirm the Commission’s determination that there was no § 337 violation in the import of the instant ball bearings.
Contact Information
- Lisa M. Gehrke, JD, MA
- James B. Gehrke, JD
- Therese M. Pease, JD
- Gehrke & Associates, SC
123 North 86th Street
Wauwatosa, WI 53226
USA
(414) 774-0874
(414) 774-4837 Fax
Follow Us
Categories
- Antitrust
- Bioethics
- Business Law
- Copyright
- Domain Names
- Events
- Firm Updates
- Government Relations
- Licensing
- Music
- Patent
- Patent Case Law
- Patent Case Law -- US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Plant Variety Protection
- Right of Publicity
- Technology
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark
- Trademark Case Law
- Trademark Case Law -- US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
- Useful Information
- USPTO Information
- Web/Tech
Wisconsin Advanced Technology Advocates, Inc.
Creative Protection
Disclaimer
Our web site contains information only and is not intended to create or solicit an attorney-client relationship. Although we welcome your questions and comments, contacting us from this web site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information you may choose to disclose is not privileged or confidential. Nothing on our web site constitutes "legal advice." If you think you may need legal advice, we urge you to consult a lawyer to discuss your unique circumstances.
© 2002-2011 Gehrke & Associates, S.C.
